Gtx 1680

Gtx 1680 DEFAULT

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G

TURING SHADERS

Featuring concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations, adaptive shading technology, and a new unified memory architecture with twice the cache of its predecessor, NVIDIA Turing™ shaders enable awesome performance increases on today's games.

AWESOME PERFORMANCE

Get game ready with performance that rivals the GeForce® GTX 1070 on the latest games with the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 1660.

GEFORCE EXPERIENCE

Capture and share videos, screenshots, and livestreams with friends. Keep your GeForce drivers up to date. And optimize your game settings. GeForce Experience™ lets you do it all. It's the essential companion to your GeForce graphics card.

 

The much anticipated return of MSI’s iconic dual fan GAMING series. Combining a mix of black and gunmetal grey with a classy brushed metal backplate, this masterpiece provides you premium design with magnificent and smooth RGB light effects on the outside. The new MSI GAMING card is designed to amaze you!

TWIN FROZR 7 LOGO

The 7th generation of the famous MSI TWIN FROZR Thermal Design brings the most advanced technology for ultimate cooling performance. It features the new TORX FAN 3.0 combined with groundbreaking aerodynamic feats. This means stable performance and a silent experience are guaranteed thanks to low temperatures.

 

Underneath all the metal are the multilayered electric highways that make up the Printed Circuit Board. They connect all the vital components and allow them to communicate at lightning speed.

Get the most out of your MSI graphics card in terms of performance and experience almost unlimited customization options with the included software.

 

Sours: https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-GAMING-X-6G.html

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

Notebookcheck

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 is a mid-tier, Turing-based, desktop GPU. The GTX 1660 relies on the TU116 chip with 1,408 shader units, 48 ROPs, 88 TMUs and a 192-bit-wide memory bus (clocked at 2 GHz = 8 GHz effectively 12 GHz, bandwidth: up to 192.1 GB/s).

The TU116 chip and other Turing-based GPUs are produced using the 12-nm manufacturing process. However, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti does not offer the latest features such as DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) and Real Time Ray Tracing. Nevertheless, there are some architectural improvements when it comes to floating point and integer performance. These operations can now be carried out simultaneously. Other notable features include Adaptive Shading, unified cache, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) as well as H.265 encoding and decoding (PlayReady 3.0).

At Full HD resolution, the GeForce GTX 1660 is slightly faster than the old GeForce GTX 1060, but clearly slower than the old GeForce GTX 1070 (and GTX 1660 Ti). Therefore, the GTX1660 is well suited for demanding games of 2019 in 1080p and high - max details (see gaming benchmarks below).

The energy consumption of the GeForce GTX 1660 amounts to 120 watts (like the 1660 Ti or GTX 1060).

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy

40.2 pt (43%)

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU -8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q -8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) -7%

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH -7%

AMD Radeon R9 290X -7%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI -5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) -2%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI 3%

AMD Radeon R9 390X 4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile 6%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) 7%

AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop) 7%

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop) 9%

AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) 9%

...

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 132%

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score

min: 5871     avg: 5928     median: 5928 (32%)     max: 5985 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) -9%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q -9%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q -6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile -4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) -3%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q -2%

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 -2%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) -1%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) 4%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile 5%

AMD Radeon RX 5600M 8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 9%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile 10%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 11%

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 12%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 13%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 14%

...

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 196%

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics

min: 5422     avg: 5462     median: 5462 (28%)     max: 5502 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q -14%

AMD Radeon R9 Fury -14%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU -12%

AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop) -11%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) -10%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti -7%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q -7%

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU -7%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q -6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile 0%

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 0%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU 2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q 3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 3%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) 6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q 7%

AMD Radeon RX 5600M 9%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 249%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics

min: 470072     avg: 474441     median: 474441 (74%)     max: 478810 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) -2%

AMD Radeon RX 6800M -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile -1%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) 0%

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 3%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) 4%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) 5%

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 5%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 5%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 6%

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 6%

NVIDIA Titan RTX 10%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) 10%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 13%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics

min: 224717     avg: 228160     median: 228160 (31%)     max: 231602 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M -19%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q -18%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile -13%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 -11%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile -9%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q -8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile -2%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) -2%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

AMD Radeon R9 380 4%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 6%

AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire 6%

AMD Radeon RX 6800M 6%

AMD Radeon R7 370 7%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) 9%

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 10%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q 11%

...

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 85%

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score

min: 45665     avg: 46556     median: 46555.5 (62%)     max: 47446 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 -4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop) -4%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile -3%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 0%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 0%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 1%

AMD Radeon RX 6700M 2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU 4%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) 4%

NVIDIA Titan X Pascal 6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) 8%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) 10%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) 10%

...

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 54%

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics

min: 74505     avg: 76970     median: 76970 (38%)     max: 79435 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire -6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 -5%

AMD Radeon R9 290X -4%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU -4%

AMD Radeon R9 390X -3%

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti -2%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) -1%

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) 2%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 2%

AMD Radeon R9 Fury 5%

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 6%

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop) 7%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 11%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) 13%

AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop) 13%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 153%

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score

min: 12524     avg: 12577     median: 12576.5 (32%)     max: 12629 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU -10%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q -8%

AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop) -5%

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop) -5%

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU -4%

AMD Radeon R9 Nano -4%

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 -2%

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q 0%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) 4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI 7%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q 9%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile 11%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q 13%

...

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 211%

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics

min: 13569     avg: 13708     median: 13708 (27%)     max: 13847 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

AMD Radeon RX 5500M -11%

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q -10%

AMD Radeon R9 390X -10%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 -8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU -8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) -7%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) -4%

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 0%

AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop) 1%

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop) 2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU 4%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) 5%

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 5%

AMD Radeon R9 Fury 6%

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI 8%

...

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 269%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics

min: 276485     avg: 280896     median: 280896 (37%)     max: 285307 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI -7%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile -5%

AMD Radeon RX 6800M -5%

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) -4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) -3%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q -2%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI -2%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI 0%

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire 1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M 5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) 6%

AMD Radeon R7 370 6%

AMD Radeon R9 380 7%

AMD Radeon R9 280X 8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 8%

...

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 62%

3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid

min: 41687     avg: 42418     median: 42417.5 (62%)     max: 43148 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile -32%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q -32%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile -22%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) -20%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile -15%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU -6%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q -6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) -5%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

AMD Radeon RX 6800M 3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 6%

AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop) 7%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 8%

AMD Radeon RX 6700M 9%

NVIDIA Titan RTX 13%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) 16%

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) 17%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 17%

...

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 57%

3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score

min: 62979     avg: 64188     median: 64188 (40%)     max: 65397 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications- 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart- Hide comparison chart

...

Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics -68%

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 -68%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) -31%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile -31%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile -30%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q -17%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) -12%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) -10%

AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop) -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 13%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU 15%

AMD Radeon RX 6800M 17%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 17%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU 26%

AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop) 36%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 37%

...

Sours: https://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-1660-Desktop-GPU-Benchmarks-and-Specs.448672.0.html
  1. Wbu online
  2. Hello neighbor hide and seek mobile stage 3
  3. Buffalo cousin crossword

GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1070: Which is best for 1080p and 1440p gaming?

After releasing a series of RTX graphics cards, it looked like the classic GTX line might have run its course. Then Nvidia announced the GTX 1660 Ti, a GPU that combines the architectural advancements of the RTX Turing line without the dedicated cores for machine learning and ray tracing; the 16-series moniker indicates a card somewhere between the 10-series GTX cards and 20-series RTX cards. At £259/$279, the GTX 1660 Ti offers a healthy performance bump over the GTX 1060 that should make it a stand-out performer for 1080p gaming, but the last-generation GTX 1070 already fulfils a similar niche. This established card is available in wider numbers for a similar price, so which is the better mid-range option: the GTX 1660 Ti or the GTX 1070?

On the face of it, the GTX 1660 Ti seems to have the edge. The new GPU has a higher boost clock, faster GDDR6 memory, greater memory bandwidth and revised shader models. It's also more efficient, with many models packing significant horsepower into a compact one-fan or two-fan design. It also comes with some new Turing features, such as support for variable rate shading, which could boost performance in some games. However, the GTX 1660 Ti also ships with 6GB of memory, compared to 8GB of VRAM on the GTX 1070, which could potentially make it less future-proof than its last-gen competitor.

The best way to see which card is the best overall is to put them to the test, so that's what we're going to do. We have tested both GPUs in nine recent and not-so-recent games, so you will be able to see precisely which games favour the GTX 1660 Ti and which go the other way in our benchmarks below. We'll also take a quick look at how these cards compare in terms of features, and how much you can expect to pay for each one.

Click the links below to jump to one of these parts directly, or scroll on to see it all!

1660ti_vs_1070

GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1070: Feature comparison

Before we get into the results, it's worth briefly covering the difference in features between the GTX 1660 Ti and the GTX 1070. As we mentioned earlier, the GTX 1660 Ti doesn't include any RT or Tensor cores, meaning the two headline features of the RTX series - real-time ray tracing (RTX) and deep learning super sampling (DLSS) - are nowhere to be found. However, Nvidia's Turing cards does include new features that don't rely on its specialist cores, and these have made the jump to the GTX 1660 Ti.

One of the most interesting is variable rate shading, a new technique which reduces detail in areas of the screen that are of less interest to the player - for example, areas in shadow. This can boost performance in games that support it, with Wolfenstein 2: The New Colossus showing about a 15 per cent boost in frame-rates at its most aggressive setting. Another nice niche feature is the upgraded NVENC encoder, which widens the options available for recording or streaming games; it's also more efficient and requires less CPU utilisation.

Of course, features that debuted on GTX 10-series cards appear on both models in our comparison. That includes support for FreeSync and G-Sync variable refresh rate displays, the GeForce Experience software and options for multi-screen gaming, streaming to Shield set-top boxes or Android smartphones and so on. That means that the GTX 1660 Ti has the lead when it comes to features, but it's a far closer race than it is when comparing 10-series cards with their newfangled RTX counterparts.

GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1070: Game benchmarks

In these results, you'll see how the GTX 1660 Ti compares to the GTX 1070 at three resolutions and in nine different games. The GTX 1660 Ti is represented by a compact PNY XLR8 card and the GTX 1070 with Nvidia's Founders Edition. It's worth noting that the XLR8 comes with a small +45MHz overclock, while the Nvidia card remains on reference specifications. With no Nvidia reference card for the GTX 1660 Ti, this is a reasonable out-of-the-box comparison of the two cards. We tested using a high-end system, including a Core i7 8700K processor overclocked to 4.7GHz on all cores to take CPU power out of the equation as much as possible. This is backed with 16GB of dual-channel memory at 3400MHz, a Corsair H100i liquid cooler and solid state storage for all tested games.

Note that we've only included the two cards we're most interested in here: the GTX 1660 Ti and the GTX 1070. If you want more context, check out our full TX 1660 Ti benchmarks page which includes comparisons with the GTX 1060, GTX 1070, RTX 2060, RX 580, RX 590 and Vega 56!

Our new benchmark system was implemented early last year, but if you haven't seen it before, here's a quick primer. Just press play on the YouTube videos below, then add or remove the video cards and resolutions you're interested in using the controls to the right of the video. You'll see how the data sources you picked handle our test scene, with real-time frame-rate and frame-time information that give a better idea of the gameplay experience than a simple average frame-rate. However, you can also scroll down a little to see a bar chart with averages if you prefer. Mouse over the chart to see more data and click to switch between fps counts and percentages. With that explanation out of the way, let's get started!

Assassin's Creed Odyssey

2018 release Assassin's Creed Odyssey is a heavy workload for any graphics card, even at 1080p. The GTX 1660 Ti gets out to an early lead here, with an eight per cent advantage at 1080p that stretches to nine per cent at 1440p. The GTX 1660 Ti faces problems at 4K though, falling behind its older competitor as texture sizes increase. Regardless, both cards hardly produce a playable experience at Ultra HD with sub-25fps averages.

AC Odyssey: Ultra High, TAA

  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Assassin's Creed Unity

Assassin's Creed Unity is four years older than Odyssey, but still provides a bit of a challenge for modern GPUs. The newer architecture of the GTX 1660 Ti isn't able to use as many tricks to get ahead here, leaving the brawnier GTX 1070 to take a small lead at each resolution we tested. However, the gap is just a few frames at every resolution, with the difference dropping to less than one fps at 4K. You'd be happy with either card here, with the option for a console-quality 4K/30 or higher frame-rates at 1080p and 1440p.

Assassin's Creed Unity: Ultra High, FXAA

  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Battlefield 1

The GTX 1070 chugs hard in Battlefield 1, with its worst performance at 1080p. That gives the GTX 1660 Ti an 11 per cent lead at 1080p, but as the resolution increases, the two cards are drawn closer together. That results in the newer card's advantage shrinking to five per cent at 1440p and just three per cent at 4K. Either way, you get a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p, with some settings tweaks required to reach 4K/60 on either GPU.

Battlefield 1: Ultra, TAA

  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Crysis 3

Coming up to six years on, Crysis 3 still has what it takes to stress GPUs at its very high preset with SMAA T2X. Perhaps unsurprisingly given the age of this game, the GTX 1070 takes the biggest lead over the GTX 1660 Ti we've seen yet, seven per cent at 1080p, nine per cent at 1440p and 12 per cent at 4K. As we take a ride on some highly explosive material, the GTX 1660 Ti exhibits some noticeable frame-time spikes; it's these that are largely responsible for the gap in performance.

Crysis 3: Very High, SMAA T2X

  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Far Cry 5

What is there to say about Far Cry 5 that hasn't already been said? It's a medium-strength benchmark, offering a decent challenge but allowing even these mid-range GPUs to hit nearly 100fps at 1080p and comfortably over 60fps at 1440p. However, 4K gaming remains at a cinematic 35fps, so we'd recommend sticking to a lower resolution or dropping some settings to ensure a fluid experience. Enlisting the aid of a FreeSync or G-Sync monitor could also make sense here. The GTX 1660 Ti is the narrow winner at 1080p, with the GTX 1070 firing back at 1440p and 4K. Shall we call it a draw?

Far Cry 5: Ultra, TAA

  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Ghost Recon Wildlands

Although it was released in 2017, Ghost Recon Wildlands is the current reigning champion when it comes to challenging in-game benchmarks. The insanely difficult ultra preset restricts the GTX 1660 Ti to just 52fps at 1080p, 41fps at 1440p and a meagre 23fps at 4K. We can see that the two cards remain close throughout, although the GTX 1660 Ti has a tendency to drop further, as evidenced by the lower worst one per cent scores.

Ghost Recon Wildlands: Ultra, TAA

  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

The first of two Tomb Raider games to be included in our benchmark suite, Rise of the Tomb Raider's benchmark is comprehensive if not an excellent reproduction of actual in-game performance. The GTX 1070 takes a narrow lead here, but both cards deliver a comfortable 100+fps at 1080p and 70+fps at 1440p.

Rise of the Tomb Raider: Very High, SMAA

  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider comes with an even longer benchmark, and this time it's a better fit for the challenge of running the game itself. The GTX 1660 Ti is able to pull ahead once again, showing its strength in modern titles compared to the GTX 1070. However, frame-rates are down across the board, with only 1080p allowing for average frame-rates above 60fps. At 1440p, we're looking at the mid-fifties, while 4K is unfortunately relegated to somewhere below 30fps. Thankfully, we're using the highest settings here, making it child's play to attain a playable frame-rate by making a few visual sacrifices.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Highest, TAA

  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

The Witcher 3

We'll conclude with The Witcher 3, a favourite of RPG fans everywhere. With the settings on Ultra (but no performance-sapping Hairworks), we're looking at over 100fps for the GTX 1070 and only 90fps for the GTX 1660 Ti. We see a similar story play out on other resolutions, with just over a 10 per cent lead at 1080p and 1440p, dropping to eight per cent at 4K.

Witcher 3: Ultra, Post-AA, No Hairworks

  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti
  • GTX 1070
  • GTX 1660 Ti

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1070: Price and availability

So, how much should you expect to pay for a GTX 1660 Ti - and how easy is it to find one? Thus far, the launch has gone smoothly, with a good number of cards available in a range of configurations from Nvidia's partners. There's no reference card this time around, so you'll have to choose your favourite custom design. Most come with small overclocks built in, but these should have only a minimal (less than three per cent) impact on performance - so choosing based on the cooling system, form factor and even absence or presence of RGB lighting might make more sense.

Generally, we've found GTX 1660 Ti cards to be available at or very near to their RRP of £259/$279, with more expensive models costing around £299/$319. We reckon that an entry-level card is your best bet, as more expensive GTX 1660 Ti models come very close to the price of an entry-level RTX 2060, which provides significantly better performance and more features.

How does the GTX 1070 stack up? The cheapest we've found one online is for £230 in the UK and $330 in the US. That UK price is a tempting one, but we reckon the (usually) faster and more future-proof GTX 1660 Ti remains the better value for money option. In any case, the used market may change this calculus; we reckon if you can find a used GTX 1070 for under £200/$220, the older card starts to make more sense. It's worth checking Ebay or your favourite user marketplace to see what's available!

With that, we've come to the end of our GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1070 comparison. Be sure to check out our full GTX 1660 Ti review for more information of how the new Nvidia card stacks up against its rivals. You can also find our always-updated best graphics card recommendations, which lay out our GPU picks at a range of price points.

Sours: https://www.eurogamer.net/
GTX 1660 Ti - How Does it Perform in 2021?

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Sours: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-RTX-3080-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1660/4080vs4038

1680 gtx

GTX 1660 vs. GTX 1660 Super vs. GTX 1660 Ti vs. RTX 2060

Nvidia’s midrange graphics lineup is far more robust in 2020 than it was this time last year, with a much broader array of options for gamers on a budget. Being spoiled for choice does have its own drawbacks though, namely that picking the right graphics card for you is much harder.

To see how these cards stack up against one another, we’ve pitted the GTX 1660 against the GTX 1660 Super, GTX 1660 Ti, and the RTX 2060, comparing their specs and features. Which will offer the most bang for the buck?

Availability and pricing

All four of the cards we’re comparing are available for purchase right now and in a staggering array of options. The RTX 2060 is the most straightforward of the three with Nvidia’s Founders Edition acting as a firm baseline. When in stock it starts at $300 for the KO edition, while overclocked cards or those with fancy cooling solutions can cost up to $370

There are no Founders Editions for the GTX 1660 Ti and 1660 Super, but those cards debuted with a bewildering number of third-party alternatives. The former sells for between $280 and $320, while the latter starts at $230, with the most expensive versions priced at around $270. The standard 1660 is the most affordable with a starting price of $220, but as you’ll see below, that’s a hard sell considering how far it falls behind the competitively priced Super version.

There are tons to choose from when it comes to all of these Turing cards, offering different clock speeds, cooling options, and lighting features. Some are a better value than others, but the cheapest offer the best return on investment in terms of performance, as we’ll see below.

Performance

Acer Predator XB3 Gaming Monitor review

Nvidia has made a concerted effort to stagger its graphics card performance and the RTX 2060, GTX 1660 Ti, and 1660 occupy distinct price and performance brackets. A look at their raw specifications betrays the real-world performance of these cards as much almost as benchmarks have been able to do.

RTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660 SuperGTX 1660
GPUTU106TU116TU116TU116
CUDA Cores1,9201,5361,4081,408
RT Cores30000
Tensor Cores240000
Core Clock1,365MHz1,500MHz1,530MHz1,530MHz
Boost Clock1,680MHz1,770MHz1,785MHz1,785MHz
Memory6GB GDDR66GB GDDR66GB GDDR66GB GDDR5
Memory Speed12Gbps12Gbps14Gbps8Gbps
Memory Bus Width192-bit192-bit192-bit192-bit
Memory Bandwidth336GBps288 GBps336GBps192GBps
TDP160w120w125w120w

Based on the specifications alone we can surmise that the most powerful of the three cards is the RTX 2060, followed by the GTX 1660 Ti, then GTX 1660 Super, with the GTX 1660 trailing in the rear. The steps from each card are a little different, however. While clock speeds are relatively comparable across all four cards (and actually a little higher on the lower-end cards), the drop in CUDA cores from the RTX 2060 to the 1660 Ti is the main differentiating factor in performance. While the 1660 does take a step down in CUDA cores too, its use of GDDR5 memory leads to a 33 percent reduction in memory bandwidth.

That’s also where the GTX 1660 Super makes up its lower CUDA core count. With faster memory, it is much closer in performance to the 1660 Ti than its other specifications might suggest.

These differences play out like you might expect in games, although there is some variation depending on your desired quality settings and resolution. In all tests the RTX 2060 comes out well ahead of its GTX Turing counterparts, offering performance comparable to a GTX 1070 Ti, if not sometimes higher. The 1660 Ti follows up with between 15 and 25 percent lower frame rates, though it does beat important AMD competitors like the RX 590. It even poses a real challenge to the Vega 56 in some cases.

The GTX 1660 Super is typically within only a few frames per second of the 1660 Ti, making it arguably the most competitive buy among the 1660s. Especially since its price is so close to that of the stock 1660.

The GTX 1660 has a strong showing against a number of cards, providing a 10-20 percent improvement over the GTX 1060 6GB in most cases. It too challenges or exceeds the RX 590 and 580 in a number of games at both 1080p and 1440p, but falls behind the 1660 Ti by between 10 and 25 percent depending on the game being tested.

Ray tracing and DLSS

Metro Exodus Review

Although the RTX 2060 has hardware-accelerated ray tracing support, the other cards do support it too, albeit in a limited capacity. Thanks to a driver update from Nvidia, all GTX cards from the 16 and 10-series can render ray tracing in-game, but without hardware acceleration using RT cores, performance isn’t great, even on high-end last-gen cards like the GTX 1080 Ti.

The difficulty with ray-traced lighting effects is that they are exceedingly GPU intensive to render. That’s why the RT cores are required and make such a difference on RTX cards; especially the higher-end ones. If you want to play ray traced games at comfortable frame rates, the RTX 2060 is the only card to opt for in this case, though it will still be limited to 1080p in most games. The GTX 16-series cards will let you get a look at what ray tracing looks like, but they won’t be able to play many ray-traced games at anything close to comfortable frame rates.

With that in mind, it’s unfortunate that deep learning super sampling support (DLSS) is restricted to RTX graphics cards. It requires Tensor cores to run and the GTX 1660, 1660 Super, and 1660 Ti just don’t have them, so they will not be able to use DLSS. The RTX 2060 can, and that could give it a further advantage when it comes to ray tracing, although the highly limited number of supported games right now makes it somewhat negligible. Furthermore, our experience of both features combined hasn’t been stellar so far.

You get what you pay for

GTX 1660 Super

If $300 – $350 is too high of a price tag for you, then the GTX 1660 Super is the best value option of the bunch. The 1660 Ti is only a worthwhile investment if you can find it at a comparable cost. The level of performance is so close between the two cards that the Super, with its typical $50 to $100 savings, is a much better buy. It almost invalidates the RX 590 from AMD, although we occasionally see some heavily discounted RX 590s, which makes it an attractive alternative.

While the GTX 1660 is a solid choice, we wouldn’t put it at the top of our list. We think that for the same price, the AMD offers superior performance. That said, the GTX 1660 has vastly improved from the previous GTX 1060 model. The RX 580 and RX 590 are both viable alternatives. They can also be notably cheaper in some cases, especially when you factor in AMD’s incredible game bundles. This is where the availability and packaging options can make or break a deal. Packages are almost always a smarter option (and a better deal) than standalone cards. It’s important to note that availability (and retailer sales) can also factor into the equation and impact pricing. If you are looking for something a little more affordable with a similar speed, check out the RX 5500 XT.

These days, we don’t recommend springing for the factory overclocked versions. Factory overclocked items and stock items currently function equally, so overclocked items no longer boast the superiority they did in past generations. The price difference between factory overclocked items and the 1660 Super is too close to make them worth it.

Overall, the RTX 2060 is the best buy of the three because of its impressive performance capabilities. It has also received the most five-star reviews. It’s the kind of quality product you’ll have to pay a pretty penny for, and we know that it might be out of your reach if you’re on a modest budget. It still blows the Turing product competition out of the water and provides far better value for the price. Over time, it’s worth the investment for the RTX 2060 — even if you have to spend some time saving up to buy it.

Editors' Recommendations

Sours: https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/gtx-1660-vs-gtx-1660-ti-vs-rtx-2060/
GTX 1660 vs. GTX 1080 (Test in 9 Games)

2x Fans. 2x Fun.

The ASUS Dual GeForce® GTX 1660 Ti sets you up with a serious advantage for high definition AAA gaming. Marathon gaming session? Multi-hour raid? With IP5X dust resistance and Auto-Extreme technology, the Dual 1660 Ti will keep pumping out frames long after competitors have bitten the dust. If you're looking for a solid, reliable gaming experience, this is it.

IP5X Dust Resistance

Keep it clean

Dust is enemy number one for fans. It's easy to clean the blades, but taking the housing apart to remove dust that has made its way inside is not a simple task. The Dual 1660 Ti comes with high-quality IP5X certified dust resistant fans, so you don't need to worry about performance degradation over time.

Auto-Extreme Technology

Precision automated manufacturing

Auto-Extreme Technology is an automated manufacturing process that sets new standards in the industry by allowing all soldering to be completed in a single pass. This reduces thermal strain on components and avoids the use of harsh cleaning chemicals, resulting in less environmental impact, lower manufacturing power consumption, and a more reliable product overall.

Our robots don't make mistakes, removing human fallibility from the equation

Fortified components offer better stability
when overclocking

Automation allows for tighter quality control

Soldering done in a single pass

Our circuit boards are smooth,
so you won't cut yourself when handling the cards

Flux-free production is
an environmentally friendly change

GPU Tweak II

Monitor, tweak, and tune

The ASUS GPU Tweak II utility takes graphics card tuning to the next level. It allows you to tweak critical parameters including GPU core clocks, memory frequency, and voltage settings, with the option to monitor everything in real-time through a customizable on-screen display. Advanced fan control is also included along with many more features to help you get the most out of your graphics card.

XSplit

Premium streaming

XSplit offers a premium streaming experience with in-game annotations and other advanced features. Enjoy a free license with the purchase of select ASUS graphics cards. See you online!  

Learn more about XSplit here >

wtfast

Play lag-free

We've partnered with wtfast to help you to play free from lag, latency issues, and lost packets. With a 6-month subscription to the wtfast Gamers Private Network, you'll enjoy lower ping for a smoother, more fluid online gaming experience. Buy an ASUS graphics card - and don't be left waiting!

Learn more about wtfast here >

wtfast

Play lag-free

We've partnered with wtfast to help you to play free from lag, latency issues, and lost packets. With a 6-month subscription to the wtfast Gamers Private Network, you'll enjoy lower ping for a smoother, more fluid online gaming experience. Buy an ASUS graphics card - and don't be left waiting!

Learn more about wtfast here >

Quantumcloud

Profit from GPU power

Quantumcloud is a simple and secure service that lets you effortlessly earn extra money by putting your idle GPU to work. Through an easy-to-use app, your computer can help run cloud-based applications, making you money in the process. Earnings are automatically transferred to your WeChat or PayPal account, and your privacy remains intact because Quantumcloud doesn't collect your personal data. Get started making money today!

Learn more about Quantum Cloud here >

144-Hour Validation Program

“Extensive” may be an understatement

Each card must meet rigorous performance and reliability standards before it ships. Performance and stress tests are run with the latest chart-topping titles like Fortnite, League of Legends, Overwatch, and PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds. We also carry out reliability trials that include a 144-hour stability test and a series of 3DMark benchmarking runs to ensure the card performs well when pushed to the limits.

NVIDIA® G-SYNC™ Technology

Smooth operator

This graphics card supports NVIDIA® G-SYNC™ display technology for a super-smooth variable refresh rate experience. Enjoy AAA games without the nuisance of screen tearing or stuttering.

Turing Shaders

Featuring concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations, adaptive shading technology, and a new unified memory architecture with twice the cache of its predecessor, Turing shaders enable awesome performance increases in today's games.

Awesome Performance

Get ready for AAA gaming with performance that rivals the GeForce GTX 1070.

GeForce Experience

Capture and share videos, screenshots, and livestreams with friends. Keep your GeForce drivers up to date, and optimize in-game settings. GeForce Experience™ is the essential companion to your GeForce graphics card.

NVIDIA Ansel

This powerful tool lets you take professional-grade screenshots of your games. Capture and share your most brilliant gaming experiences with super-resolution, 360-degree, HDR, and stereo images.

Broadcast Like a Pro

Get amazing performance and image quality while livestreaming to Twitch or YouTube. The GTX 1660 Ti's dedicated hardware encoder delivers 15% improved efficiency over prior generations of graphics cards and is optimized for Open Broadcaster Software (OBS).

Sours: https://www.asus.com/Motherboards-Components/Graphics-Cards/Dual/DUAL-GTX1660TI-O6G/

Similar news:

GeForce 16 series

Series of GPUs by Nvidia

The GeForce 16 series is a series of graphics processing units developed by Nvidia, based on the Turing microarchitecture, announced in February 2019.[1] The 16 series, commercialized within the same timeframe as the 20 series, aims to cover the entry level to midrange market, not addressed by the latter. As a result, the media have mainly compared it to AMD's Radeon RX 500 series of GPUs.

Architecture[edit]

Main article: Turing (microarchitecture)

The GeForce 16 series is based on the same Turing architecture used in the GeForce 20 series, omitting the Tensor (AI) and RT (ray tracing) cores exclusive to the 20 series. The 16 series does, however, retain the dedicated integer cores used for concurrent execution of integer and floating point operations.[2] On March 18, 2019 Nvidia announced that via a driver update in April 2019 they would enable DirectX Raytracing on 16 series cards starting with GTX 1660, together with certain cards in the 10 series, a feature reserved to the RTX series up to that point.[3]

Products[edit]

The GeForce 16 series launched on February 23, 2019 with the announcement of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.[4] The cards are PCIe 3.0 x16 cards, produced with TSMC's 12 nmFinFET process. On April 22, 2019, coinciding with the announcement of the GTX 1650, Nvidia announced laptops equipped with built-in GTX 1650 chipsets.[5] TU117 doesn't support Nvidia Optical Flow,[6] which is useful for motion interpolation software. All TU117 GPUs use Volta's NVENC encoder (which has a marginally better improvement over Pascal) instead of Turing's.[7]

Model Launch Code name(s) Transistors (billion) Die size (mm2) Core

config[a]

L1 Cache (KB) L2 Cache (KB) Clock speeds FillrateMemoryProcessing power (GFLOPS) TDP (watts) Launch price (USD)
Base core clock (MHz) Boost core clock (MHz) Memory (MT/s) Pixel (GP/ s)[b]Texture (GT/s)[c]Size (GB) Bandwidth (GB/s) Type Bus width (bit) Single precision (boost) Double precision (boost) Half precision (boost)
GeForce GTX 1650[7]April 23, 2019 TU117-300-A1 4.7 200 896:56:32:14 896 1024 1485 1665 8000 53.28 93.24 4 128 GDDR5128 2661 (2984) 83.16 (93.24) 5322 (5967) 75 $149[8]
GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)[9][10]April 3, 2020 1410 1590 12000 50.88 89.04 192 GDDR62527 (2849) 79 (89) 5053 (5699) 75 $149
GeForce GTX 1650 (TU106)[11]June 29, 2020 TU106-125-A1 10.8 445 90 N/A
GeForce GTX 1650 (TU116)[12]July 1, 2020 TU116-150-KA-A1 6.6 284 75 $149
GeForce GTX 1650 Super[13]November 22, 2019 TU116-250-KA-A1 1280:80:32:20 1280 1530 1725 55.2 110.4 3916 (4416) 122 (138) 7832 (8832) 100 $159
GeForce GTX 1660[4]March 14, 2019 TU116-300-A1 1408:88:48:22 1408 1536 1785 8000 73 135 6 GDDR5192 4308 (5027) 135 (157) 8616 (10053) 120 $219
GeForce GTX 1660 Super[14]October 29, 2019 TU116-300-A1 14000 336 GDDR6125 $229
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti[4]February 22, 2019 TU116-400-A1 1536:96:48:24 1536 1500 1770 12000 88.6 177.1 288 4608 (5437) 144 (170) 9216 (10875) 120 $279
  1. ^Shader Processors; Texture mapping units; Render output units; Streaming multi-processors
  2. ^Pixel fillrate is calculated as the lowest of three numbers: number of ROPs multiplied by the base core clock speed, number of rasterizers multiplied by the number of fragments they can generate per rasterizer multiplied by the base core clock speed, and the number of streaming multiprocessors multiplied by the number of fragments per clock that they can output multiplied by the base clock rate.
  3. ^Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of TMUs multiplied by the base core clock speed.

Reception[edit]

Tom's Hardware criticized the GTX 1650, noting that the 8GB variant of the RX 570 is "[...] faster, less expensive and better able to handle games with big memory requirements."[15]

Forbes described the GTX 1650 as "[...] a tempting choice for a super-small and power-efficient gaming PC [...]".[16] However, "[...] when it comes to value and bang for your buck, AMD’s RX 570 is the clear choice overall."[16]

PC Gamer described the GTX 1650 Super as a "[...] no-brainer" and a "[...] super easy recommendation [...]" over the original 1650, as it only costs 10$ more and is "[...] consistently around 30 percent faster [...]".[17] However, they criticized the small amount of VRAM (4GB) and noted that users who have a PC which does not have PCIe power cables available have to "[...] stick with the vanilla 1650 [...]" because the Super variant has a higher power consumption (75W vs 100W).[17] Altogether, it has a "great overall value" and for now "[...] claims the crown for best budget graphics card", being consistently faster than the RX 580 and coming close to the RX 590 when the VRAM is not a limiting factor.[17]

They found that the GTX 1660 Super "[...] almost makes the 1660 Ti look redundant [...]" and noted that "[...] it outperforms anything AMD currently offers in the same price range [...]", being "[...] about 20 percent faster than the RX 590 [...]".[18]

References[edit]

  1. ^NVIDIA Newsroom (February 22, 2019). "New GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Delivers Great Performance Leap for Every Gamer, Starting at $279 | NVIDIA Newsroom". Nvidianews.nvidia.com. Retrieved October 22, 2019.
  2. ^"The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Review, Feat. EVGA XC GAMING: Turing Sheds RTX for the Mainstream Market". Anandtech.
  3. ^"Accelerating The Real-Time Ray Tracing Ecosystem: DXR For GeForce RTX and GeForce GTX". NVIDIA.
  4. ^ abc"16: THE NEW SUPERCHARGER - GEFORCE GTX 1660 Ti". NVIDIA. February 22, 2019. Retrieved February 22, 2019.
  5. ^"GEFORCE GTX 1650 GAMING LAPTOPS". Nvidia.
  6. ^"NVIDIA Optical Flow SDK". Nvidia.
  7. ^ ab"GeForce GTX 1650 Graphics Card". NVIDIA. Retrieved October 22, 2019.
  8. ^"Turing Now Starts at $149: Introducing GeForce GTX 1650". Nvidia.
  9. ^"GeForce GTX 1650 Graphics Card". NVIDIA. Retrieved April 3, 2020.
  10. ^Dexter, Alan (April 3, 2020). "Nvidia's GTX 1650 gets GDDR6 because 'the industry is running out of GDDR5'". PC Gamer. Retrieved April 4, 2020.
  11. ^"GeForce GTX 1650 (TU106)". Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  12. ^"NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 TU116". Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  13. ^"GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Graphics Card". NVIDIA. Retrieved November 22, 2019.
  14. ^"GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Graphics Card". NVIDIA. Retrieved November 22, 2019.
  15. ^Angelini, Chris (2019-04-24). "Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 4GB Review: This Turing Fails the Test". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved 2021-02-07.
  16. ^ abLeather, Antony. "Nvidia GTX 1650 Versus AMD RX 570: What's The Best Budget Graphics Card?". Forbes. Retrieved 2021-03-27.
  17. ^ abcWalton, Jarred (2019-11-23). "Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super review". PC Gamer. Retrieved 2021-02-07.
  18. ^Walton, Jarred (2019-10-29). "Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super review". PC Gamer. Retrieved 2021-02-07.

External links[edit]

Sours: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_16_series


11 12 13 14 15